Resources

>

Technical Briefs

>

Energy

>

What are the manufacturing alternatives to Flexible Printed Circuits (FPC) for low-voltage signals in EV batteries?

DIRECT ANSWER

Unlike FPCs that use multi-step, chemical-heavy photolithography, alternative die-cut circuits use a continuous reel-to-reel process, significantly reducing production steps, manufacturing time, and costs while enabling instant clean copper recycling.

Flexible Printed Circuits (FPCs) are traditionally used in EV battery cell contacting systems, but they are often the most expensive component in the current collector assembly. FPCs are manufactured through a complex, multi-stage, batch photolithography process to etch copper traces for the flexible circuit. 

A major environmental drawback of this traditional method is that it uses harsh, corrosive chemicals to dissolve the unneeded and excess copper. Consequently, this process is both time- and energy-consuming. Furthermore, FPCs manufacturing makes copper recycling difficult.

How Does Flexible Die-Cut (FDC) Technology Provide a Superior Alternative?

Flexible Die-cut Circuit (FDC) technology is a more cost-effective and sustainable alternative that replaces the chemical etching of FPCs with a continuous, reel-to-reel mechanical die-cutting manufacturing process. This method produces a flexible, flat device featuring copper traces created through a sustainable manufacturing path that involves fewer processes. 

Contrasted with traditional photolithography, FDC technology provides high-precision die-cutting that results in tight tolerances without chemical waste, while its continuous copper traces provide a reliable signal.

What Efficiency Gains Can Manufacturers Expect by Switching from FPC to FDC?

Switching from FPCs to FDCs delivers major efficiency and financial advantages. With FDC, cost savings of up to 50% are achievable without compromising on technical capabilities and performance. Furthermore, manufacturers can realize a 50% reduction in production process time by eliminating multiple manufacturing steps compared to its printed counterpart. 

This reduction comes from a simpler and more efficient production process. Creating an FPC requires 12 process steps, while creating an FDC only requires 9. More importantly, the 3 steps eliminated in FDC involve chemical etching, which are among the slowest and most costly parts of the process.

In FPC production, chemical etching is batch-oriented and requires dwell time during drying, exposure, and etching. As a result, this stage can take 2โ€“3 days to complete. In contrast, FDC uses a continuous precision die-cutting process, which removes these delays and helps accelerate overall production.

The comparison below shows the key differences between the two processes:

FPCFDC
Copper LayerChemically EtchedDie Cut
Minimum Trace Width0.25mm0.35mm
Minimum Trace Pitch0.30mm0.35mm
Laminate LayerPI, PET, or PENPI, PET, or PEN
CostHigherLower
Cycle timeIn batchesContinuous
RecyclabilityNAYes

Beyond process efficiency, manufacturers can also benefit from design flexibility. Our FDC approach supports traces with a diameter of 0.35 mm and above, and both the size and trace design can be easily customized for diverse end applications.

Why is FDC Considered a More Sustainable Choice for Low-Voltage Signals?

FDC is considered a more sustainable choice for low-voltage signals because the die-cutting process enables the instant recycling of clean copper waste material directly from the line. This effectively eliminates the need for the energy-consuming chemical recovery processes and environmental challenges associated with traditional FPC etching. Ultimately, this process embraces sustainability and makes ENNOVIโ€™s FDC technology ideal for supporting a myriad of low-voltage solutions while maintaining a lower impact on the environment.

Transitioning to Clean, High-Speed FDC Manufacturing

Flexible die-cut circuit (FDC) technology is a more cost-effective and sustainable alternative for producing flexible circuits for low voltage signals in EV battery contacting systems. Our FDC approach is suitable for traces with a diameter of 0.35mm and above. The size and trace design can be customized for your end applications.

Our goal is to ensure that the designs are technically sound and economically viable for mass production. By participating from the early stages, we help our customers refine their concepts into practical, manufacturable solutions that align with both their performance and budgetary requirements.

Have a specific project in mind?

Our application engineers work on BTS and BTP programmes across global EV OEM and Tier-1 projects. Tell us your pack architecture and current profile and we’ll recommend the right bus bar approach.

DOWNLOAD

Bus Bar Selection Guide

ENNOVIโ€™s full material selection guide for HV bus bars โ€” Al, Cu, laminated, and flexible options with specification data.

Coming Soon

HAVE A SPECIFIC PROJECT?

Speak to an Application Engineer

Our engineers work on BTS and BTP projects across global EV OEM and Tier-1 programmes

Brief details

Portfolio

Energy

Products

ENNOVI-CellConnect-Round,
CellConnect-Pouch,
CellConnect-Prism,
Adhesive-Free Lamination,
FDC Technology, Press-Fit (battery)

Buyer stage

Manufacturing & Cost Efficiency

Author

ENNOVI

Last updated

June 2026

Other engineers also read

Continue exploring Power and Energy technical briefs

Discover ENNOVI Technical Lens

Explore engineering insights, technical perspectives, and practical solutions across Battery Interconnects, Power, and Signal applications.

Before using this website, please read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice.